eNews

Divorce is never easy, but when you add the complexity of a beloved dog or cat into the equation, things can become even more difficult and emotional for everyone involved. This article aims to provide some guidelines for divorce professionals to help their clients address the issue of “who keeps the dog?” (or cat!) in a way that minimizes the conflict surrounding the pets in the short term and long term with realistic expectations for the feasibly of the plan and well-being of the animals concerned.

As many of us welcome the crisp autumn air and vibrant colors of October, I find myself reflecting on past accomplishments and looking forward to the opportunities ahead.

I’m excited to share that AFCC membership has reached a post-COVID high. At a time when many organizations face diminishing membership, this growth reflects how often non-members join us for an event or training, see the value firsthand, and choose to make AFCC their professional home. It also speaks to the remarkable dedication of our chapters, whose leadership continues to expand the reach and relevance of our mission and vision. My heartfelt thanks to our chapter leaders and members who foster connection and professional growth in their communities. Each chapter is, and each of us as individuals are, part of this interdisciplinary organization whose vision is “A justice system in which all professionals work collaboratively through education, support, and access to services to achieve the best possible outcome for children and families.”

One of the most disliked aspects of family law litigation is cross-examination. People have a universal aversion to it, from litigators to parents to experts. In family law cases, there are many types of individuals a lawyer will need to cross-examine. Often, the lawyer will cross-examine at least one of the parents, an evaluator or Guardian ad Litem, mental health professionals for either parent or the minor child, or other various experts, professionals, or friends and family. Effective cross-examination is a critical tool for litigators to help paint a picture for the factfinder (Judge) of what is in the best interest of the children, just as understanding effective cross-examination is also a critical tool for any professional in a family law case so they are prepared to answer questions in a way that is useful to the factfinder in making decisions for families. The author reflects on the purpose of cross-examination and offers some key guidelines for lawyers cross-examining witnesses and for those who face cross-examination during testimony.

Family Law Forensic Mental Health (FLFMH) is facing a critical juncture. With many professionals retiring or leaving the field—often due to its inherently litigious nature and the demands it places on practitioners—there is a growing shortage of qualified experts. This exodus is creating a significant gap in access to essential services for families and the courts. The few remaining specialists are stretched thin, managing overwhelming caseloads and extended waitlists. Meanwhile, most academic and clinical training programs offer limited, if any, opportunities for education in FLFMH, making it difficult for new professionals to enter the field.

Following 3 years of collaboration, AFCC and ABA Family Section Task Force, under the leadership of Nancy Ver Steegh, JD, MSW, Chair; Stacy Heard, JD, Chair; Donna Erez-Navot, JD, BSW, Reporter, unanimously approved the 2025 Revisions of Model Standards for Family and Divorce Mediation. Below, Donna Erez-Navot shares a reflection of the Task Force's journey to the publication of the Standards through her foreword, and a link to review the final product.